Malkoo's Animals Male Genital Gallery

New evidence of illegality

Normal.dotm

The city of Madrid is a special supporter of these systems for the detection of irregularities that make when driving. Proof of this has been the tremendous growth that has seen the city of Madrid in recent years, currently being plagued by various uptake systems for drivers, which has been a juicy collection of millions of euros that have been latter to pay in fines to the session Madrid.

The reliability of the radar is now more than ever in doubt and there are already many tests that show the malfunction of many of the systems used to sanction Onar and proof of this are the various news items that have appeared in the media with headlines like,

"Traffic will prove the perfect OPERATING

ent radar to impose fines" (El Mundo) The Tribunal Superior de Justicia de Madrid ( TSJM) has annulled the fine imposed for speeding a driver because the Administration did not provide in the issuing entity the documents verifying the correct operation of radar

who photographed the offense .. According to the ruling, has not "perfect operation" of the radar, "which prevented certainly the findings of infringement despite the photographic document.

"They claim that a radar in the A-5 m ulta

10 km / h below the set" (AEA http://www.aeaclub.com/destacado/ ) The radar installed at a height of 12.100 km of the highway A-5 fine on drivers who exceed 80 miles an hour, if that same leg circulation is limited to 90 miles per hour.

In that regard, he noted that this situation is "more frequent

" of what is believed. Thus, said that between July and September last year

radar located at Km 52.800 of the M-40

, wound down, fined dozens of drivers exceeded 50 mph when this stretch there is limited to 100 .

Normal.dotm

expert testimony sent to our blog and expose li

laterally.

My name is xxxxxx, for more than twenty-five years I am a computer graphics and the development of techniques for the identification and three-dimensional electronic monitoring. Although I personally do not drive, I have car companies, which often leads my wife with extreme caution. For decades there has been a fine, and I can assure that strictly complies with all the signs you may encounter on the street. However, during the past month and a half has suddenly received five violations for excessive speed, all relate to the same point at kilometer 4 of the A-5, known as the Highway of Extremadura. As stated in the report

as fines, the first of the fractions in

was charged on February 19, 2010, and received on Monday, April 5, 2010, forty-seven days after the offense committed. In the following days we four others received additional fines, charged exactly the same number of km. This point is located just after the tunnel exit M-30 in the direction of Alcorcón, and just when the slope of output ends of the tunnels of the M-30.
Inside the tunnel there is only remotely controlled electronic neon signs, reporting on the speed limit is defined at all times, according to the criteria of the relevant traffic authorities. On Sunday April 11 we again by the output of the A-5, and saw the neon sign above the exit of the tunnel was damaged at the time. always frustrating for a driver subject to a traffic ticket, but if the fine is charged with the goal of punishing and especially notify

conduct an Omala that a driver may have committed either intentionally or accidentally so that the driver GRIND his leadership at the point where the infraction, the penalty is a perfectly understandable and should be respected in any rule of law. However, if notice of a first offense at some point in the street, is communicated with forty-seven days late, then it is completely futile mission to correct the attitude or habit of the driver at that point of infringement. Moreover, during the forty-seven days elapsed between when the driver commits the offense and the time and
l is reported that it is quite possible that the driver re-offend again and again in the same offense because it is part of being human as they act more usual mechanical manner if it receives notice that correct, as is well known sociologists who study the habits and repetitive behaviors that individuals perform in their daily work. The result of the delay in notification of the infringements and
s easy to spot: the driver of the vehicle will undoubtedly receive numerous fines the same concept, without any possibility that it may be even aware that they were committing an offense day after day. therefore only be inferred from this form of extremely delayed notification of the violations, the purpose of them is not to correct the attitude of the driver, but to ensure that the offender re-offending in error the maximum number of times to so you have time to charge a higher amount of violations to the driver and thereby raise the most money possible. Furthermore, as the vehicle owner is forced to disclose the identity of the driver of the vehicle, it is easier to be wrong or omit any of the relevant communications, so that you can charge a much higher fine amount for the delay or lack of such communication on the driver's identity. the reasoning of the methodology used in the automatic assignment of penalties, something clearly machining and programmed by direct manipulative control system shows that the ultimate goal of this way of proceeding is not to increase road safety, plain and simple but increase the revenue capacity of the Municipality of Madrid, with the ultimate mission of page ar the huge debts incurred by it.
legally defenseless individual gets penalized in this way penalty is ABSOLUTE. The accused driver has no way to prove or disprove that committed the offense for which he is charged, since there is no way to register for an autonomous and independent in time and space, its actual speed at the time of the alleged infringement. UNILATERAL must accept the accusation made by the technical apparatus of registration, regardless of or able to demonstrate that the device is or not in working condition, if the device is properly calibrated or sim ply tort has been manipulated by some same operator,
in order to increase the relevant income tax collection to achieve some amount fixed in advance. Additionally, since the speed warnings to be observed by the driver are
also electronics, ie values \u200b\u200bremotely controllable and modifiable at any time, according to the needs of traffic flow or simply the whim of any operator, the driver is equally helpless to prove that when the speed limit imposed at some point was that the road network and not another. To do so, in order to defend the official indictment, each driver would be required to videotape and inland attorney all the journeys made, or continuous recording its pos ition
space via GPS, to this day something entirely feasible technically. The only way a driver would try to defend against this accusation unilateral, is the extremely remote possibility to compare the documents

tion provided by the official agency documentation that provides an equally unilateral. To do this, the accused should be able to have the great good fortune, statistically improbable, committing exactly the same offense in the same spot and the same speed, so you can show a posteriori, independently, that there are serious suspicions the technical reliability of the devices

utomáticos or computer system that assigns and records of fines. Well, this was precisely the case presented. Then bring the documentary evidence provided by the city of Madrid, five penalties charged to the same point, recorded with the same fixed camera, and having as subject to the same vehicle traveling in the same lane and similar speeds. Were provided five photographs scanned from five penalties rec
ibid. The fines have been charged in almost consecutive days on 19, 22, 24 February and 1 and April 3, at respective rates of 85, 79, 79, 82, and 96 kilometers per hour, when the limit allegedly marked in the electronic panels in those days was 70 km / h. Since we have the great, the unprecedented lucky that at least two of the speeds reported in the fines agreed, we proceeded to conduct the relevant comparison between the photographs of both. As we all know that electronic measuring devices handle high precis ion, as is the case, we know that well-calibrated automatic devices is the fundamental characteristic of providing the same records at identical physical conditions, but when such devices as automatic react to the speed of light, ie of the differences are bound to be almost identical, except for a prior accidental or deliberate error in the calibration of equipment or a malfunction manifest themselves

which completely disqualify the use of this system and the legal road for all penalties provided by this system. It is clear from the first comparison made

between the two pictures made at 79 km / h (Fig. CASE 1), we find, surprisingly, that the position of the vehicle, visual data as reported, does NOT match at all , a difference of position of distance that can easily be half a meter away, something manifestly impossible in

electronic registration system supposedly accurate as that now claims to have the City of Madrid.

Both

more surprising is the second comparison (image

CA
SO 2) in which the photographed vehicle is not traveling at 79 km / h, but at 85 km / h, yet its height of displacement is virtually identical in both vehicles Another aberration unacceptable from a technical standpoint to a system of very high precision, which would have great implications on the overall security

vi

to and of course on the economy of a majority of citizens of Madrid, use their vehicles under the constant supervision of a unilateral system out of control city, and can be manipulated or improperly calibrated and severe financial penalties assigned users of public roads they already pay through their taxes. These differences should be cause enough for at least question or review from the standpoint of technical and legal feasibility of unilateral registration system implemented by the City of Madrid, and the case presented should be considered a precedent and obvious when defending the rights of hundreds of thousands of locals who are being irresponsible and unfairly fined a desire almost exclusively tax collection, and are currently in a state of absolute helplessness LEGAL to the City of Madrid.