Councilman Pedro Calvo is mockery of law and the courts
Councilman Pedro Calvo is mockery of law and the courts.
With reference to the letter published below, and after five months of notification of the sentence, no payment has been no breach of a formal condemnation by a court of law.
This neglect is not surprising since it is a municipal government spending, but the mere return of an amount collected by a citizen against the law. This is the concept of justice and the rule of law who has this council And how do these illegal practices shown to the public and submitted to the voters at the next election?
Tuesday, September 28, 2010
Tarak Mehtas Shooting Place
Councilman Pedro Calvo is mockery of law and the courts
Councilman Pedro Calvo is mockery of law and the courts.
With reference to the letter published below, and after five months of notification of the sentence, no payment has been no breach of a formal condemnation by a court of law.
This neglect is not surprising since it is a municipal government spending, but the mere return of an amount collected by a citizen against the law. This is the concept of justice and the rule of law who has this council And how do these illegal practices shown to the public and submitted to the voters at the next election?
Councilman Pedro Calvo is mockery of law and the courts.
With reference to the letter published below, and after five months of notification of the sentence, no payment has been no breach of a formal condemnation by a court of law.
This neglect is not surprising since it is a municipal government spending, but the mere return of an amount collected by a citizen against the law. This is the concept of justice and the rule of law who has this council And how do these illegal practices shown to the public and submitted to the voters at the next election?
M Graham Alkayd Medium
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo, CEO of Mobility of the Madrid City Charter
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo
After the decision published in the Administrative Court No. 22 in Madrid on April 19 condemning the municipality to impose a fine illegal and published on this blog on May 21, are pending on the same facts and legal grounds, ie lack of notification in the form, some records.
's lawyer wrote a letter, also reproduced below, Councilman Pedro Calvo suggesting that overrides files automatically to avoid the multiple convictions for unlawful City.
Thus, Councilman faces a cruel dilemma: withdraw, and publicly acknowledged the illegality of the sanctions imposed by the council or risk new sentences by the courts.
More than likely the court to vacate these fines Is it possible then that the concegal not risk more convictions if you have the possibility to revoke these acts administrator?
surprising that a time of economic crisis and the need to reduce expenditures by the municipal housing management, Councilman, if not revoke the fines, choose the most damaging decision for money from city hall, because a conviction against the City would force him to return not only the money but the interest and penalty trial costs that can add up to 150% of the amount of the fine.
still rely on the wisdom of the Councillor and his respect for the law and the public interest and appropriate to officially withdraw the fines.
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo
After the decision published in the Administrative Court No. 22 in Madrid on April 19 condemning the municipality to impose a fine illegal and published on this blog on May 21, are pending on the same facts and legal grounds, ie lack of notification in the form, some records.
's lawyer wrote a letter, also reproduced below, Councilman Pedro Calvo suggesting that overrides files automatically to avoid the multiple convictions for unlawful City.
Thus, Councilman faces a cruel dilemma: withdraw, and publicly acknowledged the illegality of the sanctions imposed by the council or risk new sentences by the courts.
More than likely the court to vacate these fines Is it possible then that the concegal not risk more convictions if you have the possibility to revoke these acts administrator?
surprising that a time of economic crisis and the need to reduce expenditures by the municipal housing management, Councilman, if not revoke the fines, choose the most damaging decision for money from city hall, because a conviction against the City would force him to return not only the money but the interest and penalty trial costs that can add up to 150% of the amount of the fine.
still rely on the wisdom of the Councillor and his respect for the law and the public interest and appropriate to officially withdraw the fines.
M Graham Alkayd Medium
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo, CEO of Mobility of the Madrid City Charter
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo
After the decision published in the Administrative Court No. 22 in Madrid on April 19 condemning the municipality to impose a fine illegal and published on this blog on May 21, are pending on the same facts and legal grounds, ie lack of notification in the form, some records.
's lawyer wrote a letter, also reproduced below, Councilman Pedro Calvo suggesting that overrides files automatically to avoid the multiple convictions for unlawful City.
Thus, Councilman faces a cruel dilemma: withdraw, and publicly acknowledged the illegality of the sanctions imposed by the council or risk new sentences by the courts.
More than likely the court to vacate these fines Is it possible then that the concegal not risk more convictions if you have the possibility to revoke these acts administrator?
surprising that a time of economic crisis and the need to reduce expenditures by the municipal housing management, Councilman, if not revoke the fines, choose the most damaging decision for money from city hall, because a conviction against the City would force him to return not only the money but the interest and penalty trial costs that can add up to 150% of the amount of the fine.
still rely on the wisdom of the Councillor and his respect for the law and the public interest and appropriate to officially withdraw the fines.
New challenge for Councilman Pedro Calvo
After the decision published in the Administrative Court No. 22 in Madrid on April 19 condemning the municipality to impose a fine illegal and published on this blog on May 21, are pending on the same facts and legal grounds, ie lack of notification in the form, some records.
's lawyer wrote a letter, also reproduced below, Councilman Pedro Calvo suggesting that overrides files automatically to avoid the multiple convictions for unlawful City.
Thus, Councilman faces a cruel dilemma: withdraw, and publicly acknowledged the illegality of the sanctions imposed by the council or risk new sentences by the courts.
More than likely the court to vacate these fines Is it possible then that the concegal not risk more convictions if you have the possibility to revoke these acts administrator?
surprising that a time of economic crisis and the need to reduce expenditures by the municipal housing management, Councilman, if not revoke the fines, choose the most damaging decision for money from city hall, because a conviction against the City would force him to return not only the money but the interest and penalty trial costs that can add up to 150% of the amount of the fine.
still rely on the wisdom of the Councillor and his respect for the law and the public interest and appropriate to officially withdraw the fines.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)